<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why does Activiti TaskListener extend java.io.Serializable in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-does-activiti-tasklistener-extend-java-io-serializable/m-p/218206#M171336</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The rationale is that these classes can be in a distributed cache (swapping out the default process definition cache).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-03-01T20:10:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does Activiti TaskListener extend java.io.Serializable</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-does-activiti-tasklistener-extend-java-io-serializable/m-p/218205#M171335</link>
      <description>I would like to know the reason why Activiti TaskListener was made to extend java.io.Serializable.Because TaskListener extends java.io.Serializable , if the implementation classes for TaskListener use references to other classes , the code review tool is suggesting the following :"Fields in a Serial</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:21:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-does-activiti-tasklistener-extend-java-io-serializable/m-p/218205#M171335</guid>
      <dc:creator>gkd_deepak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-24T21:21:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Activiti TaskListener extend java.io.Serializable</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-does-activiti-tasklistener-extend-java-io-serializable/m-p/218206#M171336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The rationale is that these classes can be in a distributed cache (swapping out the default process definition cache).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2016 20:10:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-does-activiti-tasklistener-extend-java-io-serializable/m-p/218206#M171336</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-03-01T20:10:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

