<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: using 'residual' properties in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/using-residual-properties/m-p/216746#M169876</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As you have already found, a "residual" property is a property which is not defined in the data dictionary.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I don't think its a "bug" that is going to be fixed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Perhaps another approach to consider would be to to add your own namespace, dac, and define an aspect that contains dac:employeeId.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Then you would not need to worry about variable name clashes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:33:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-02-25T09:33:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>using 'residual' properties</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/using-residual-properties/m-p/216745#M169875</link>
      <description>Recently, I discovered that I can create a property of cm&lt;IMG id="smileytongue" class="emoticon emoticon-smileytongue" src="https://migration33.stage.lithium.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.png" alt="Smiley Tongue" title="Smiley Tongue" /&gt;erson that isn't defined in the cm&lt;IMG id="smileytongue" class="emoticon emoticon-smileytongue" src="https://migration33.stage.lithium.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-tongue.png" alt="Smiley Tongue" title="Smiley Tongue" /&gt;erson document model.&amp;nbsp; It shows up as a "residual" property in the lucene search, and it is still query-able.&amp;nbsp; I'm curious what the properties of these residual items are?&amp;nbsp; I'd rather not hack on the core</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 20:35:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/using-residual-properties/m-p/216745#M169875</guid>
      <dc:creator>abruzzi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-24T20:35:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: using 'residual' properties</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/using-residual-properties/m-p/216746#M169876</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As you have already found, a "residual" property is a property which is not defined in the data dictionary.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I don't think its a "bug" that is going to be fixed.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Perhaps another approach to consider would be to to add your own namespace, dac, and define an aspect that contains dac:employeeId.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Then you would not need to worry about variable name clashes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 09:33:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/using-residual-properties/m-p/216746#M169876</guid>
      <dc:creator>mrogers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-02-25T09:33:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

