<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: search.findNode() performance issue in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/search-findnode-performance-issue/m-p/216206#M169336</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Analyzing the problem seems that the problem is accessing the database. I've enabled the query log and this is the sql&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;PRE class="language-none line-numbers"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select this_.protocol as protocol5_2_, this_.identifier as identifier5_2_, this_.guid as guid5_2_, this_.version as version5_2_, this_.transaction_id as transact5_5_2_, this_.node_id as node6_5_2_, node1_.id as id2_0_, node1_.version as version2_0_, node1_.protocol as protocol2_0_, node1_.identifier as identifier2_0_, node1_.uuid as uuid2_0_, node1_.type_qname_id as type6_2_0_, node1_.acl_id as acl7_2_0_, dbaccessco4_.id as id14_1_, dbaccessco4_.version as version14_1_, dbaccessco4_.acl_id as acl3_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.latest as latest14_1_, dbaccessco4_.acl_version as acl5_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.inherits as inherits14_1_, dbaccessco4_.inherits_from as inherits7_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.type as type14_1_, dbaccessco4_.inherited_acl as inherited9_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.is_versioned as is10_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.requires_version as requires11_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.acl_change_set as acl12_14_1_, properties5_.node_id as node1_4_, properties5_.actual_type_n as actual2_4_, properties5_.persisted_type_n as persisted3_4_, properties5_.multi_valued as multi4_4_, properties5_.boolean_value as boolean5_4_, properties5_.long_value as long6_4_, properties5_.float_value as float7_4_, properties5_.double_value as double8_4_, properties5_.string_value as string9_4_, properties5_.attribute_value as attribute10_4_, properties5_.serializable_value as seriali11_4_, properties5_.qname_id as qname12_4_ from alf_node_status this_ inner join alf_node node1_ on this_.node_id=node1_.id left outer join alf_access_control_list dbaccessco4_ on node1_.acl_id=dbaccessco4_.id left outer join alf_node_properties properties5_ on node1_.id=properties5_.node_id where this_.guid in ('5cfcaaa2-e0fb-40e6-81af-caef53b5876f', '5cfcaaa2-e0fb-40e6-81af-caef53b5876f')&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN class="line-numbers-rows"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried to give much memory to database (1,5G) but the performance remains poor. Any idea?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andrepra</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-30T08:03:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>search.findNode() performance issue</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/search-findnode-performance-issue/m-p/216205#M169335</link>
      <description>Alfresco 3.0 with about 1M documents. Windows Server 2003 4Gb, Tomcat 5.5 with 1Gb, MySQL 5.0. Few cuncurrent users (3-6). Documents and spaces are well structured (i mean not to may node at the same level)Using Alfresco interface the performance are quite good. Also using the node browser performan</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:11:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/search-findnode-performance-issue/m-p/216205#M169335</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrepra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-29T08:11:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: search.findNode() performance issue</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/search-findnode-performance-issue/m-p/216206#M169336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Analyzing the problem seems that the problem is accessing the database. I've enabled the query log and this is the sql&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;PRE class="language-none line-numbers"&gt;&lt;CODE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;select this_.protocol as protocol5_2_, this_.identifier as identifier5_2_, this_.guid as guid5_2_, this_.version as version5_2_, this_.transaction_id as transact5_5_2_, this_.node_id as node6_5_2_, node1_.id as id2_0_, node1_.version as version2_0_, node1_.protocol as protocol2_0_, node1_.identifier as identifier2_0_, node1_.uuid as uuid2_0_, node1_.type_qname_id as type6_2_0_, node1_.acl_id as acl7_2_0_, dbaccessco4_.id as id14_1_, dbaccessco4_.version as version14_1_, dbaccessco4_.acl_id as acl3_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.latest as latest14_1_, dbaccessco4_.acl_version as acl5_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.inherits as inherits14_1_, dbaccessco4_.inherits_from as inherits7_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.type as type14_1_, dbaccessco4_.inherited_acl as inherited9_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.is_versioned as is10_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.requires_version as requires11_14_1_, dbaccessco4_.acl_change_set as acl12_14_1_, properties5_.node_id as node1_4_, properties5_.actual_type_n as actual2_4_, properties5_.persisted_type_n as persisted3_4_, properties5_.multi_valued as multi4_4_, properties5_.boolean_value as boolean5_4_, properties5_.long_value as long6_4_, properties5_.float_value as float7_4_, properties5_.double_value as double8_4_, properties5_.string_value as string9_4_, properties5_.attribute_value as attribute10_4_, properties5_.serializable_value as seriali11_4_, properties5_.qname_id as qname12_4_ from alf_node_status this_ inner join alf_node node1_ on this_.node_id=node1_.id left outer join alf_access_control_list dbaccessco4_ on node1_.acl_id=dbaccessco4_.id left outer join alf_node_properties properties5_ on node1_.id=properties5_.node_id where this_.guid in ('5cfcaaa2-e0fb-40e6-81af-caef53b5876f', '5cfcaaa2-e0fb-40e6-81af-caef53b5876f')&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN class="line-numbers-rows"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;‍&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried to give much memory to database (1,5G) but the performance remains poor. Any idea?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 08:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/search-findnode-performance-issue/m-p/216206#M169336</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrepra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-30T08:03:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: search.findNode() performance issue</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/search-findnode-performance-issue/m-p/216207#M169337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I found interesting this test: I changed my webscript&amp;nbsp; removing the JavaScript thet load the node using the method search.findNode() and implementing a WebScript bean that do the works using the nodeService.getProperties(). This method is incredibly faster than JavaScript search api. I have to change all my applications implementing backed web script and forget javascript search api when i have a lot of documents?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 18:08:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/search-findnode-performance-issue/m-p/216207#M169337</guid>
      <dc:creator>andrepra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-04T18:08:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

