topic Re: Suspended process definition is executed in Alfresco Archive

Suspended process definition is executed

kayj — Fri, 01 Jul 2016 13:28:06 GMT

Hi,we have a BPMN Model ErrorHandling which calls a CallActivity with the BPMN Model id "projectSpecificErrorHandling".We further do have 2 BPMN models with the id "projectSpecificErrorHandling". * One for a default error handling and * one for a customer specific error handling.Dependent on our pro

Re: Suspended process definition is executed

kayj — Tue, 05 Jul 2016 07:03:39 GMT

I just noticed that I made a mistake in the description. Instead of
"In order to assure that the project-specific error handling is called in the CallActivity…"
the correct sentence would be:
"In order to assure that the default error handling is called in the CallActivity…"

Any help regarding this issue would be great!

Re: Suspended process definition is executed

kayj — Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:17:35 GMT

By writing a Unit Test I figured out that it depends on whether a suspended process definition is called directly, or from within another process.

To make it more clear: if the latest version of a process definition is set to "suspended", it is not possible to start it by key (startProcessInstanceByKey).
If the process is called via a CallActiviti, it is started even though it is set to "suspended".

Is this behaviour intended?

Re: Suspended process definition is executed

kayj — Thu, 07 Jul 2016 11:06:15 GMT

Guess it has been fixed in Activiti 5.18.0. https://activiti.atlassian.net/browse/ACT-2185

But I'd still expect the last deployed version, which is not suspended, to be executed since not the whole process definition has been suspended. Any statements regarding this?