<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is the Vacation Request diagram a valid BPMN diagram? in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/is-the-vacation-request-diagram-a-valid-bpmn-diagram/m-p/31690#M16382</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Indeed, the outgoing sequence flow should have a diamond in this case.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The XML does have the expressions on the sequence flow defined.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So you are correct, the process diagram is not 100% valid, I'll update the picture accordingly in the userguide.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As a sidenote: multiple outgoing sequence flow without sequence flow out of an activity are legal in BPMN 2.0. The semantics are then that all the outgoing sequence flow become parallel executions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:55:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-15T14:55:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is the Vacation Request diagram a valid BPMN diagram?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/is-the-vacation-request-diagram-a-valid-bpmn-diagram/m-p/31689#M16381</link>
      <description>Hi,&amp;nbsp; There are 2 outgoing sequence flows with no conditions (no diamonds) in the Adjust Vacation Request Activity. Thus, it seems that this would be an infinite loop.&amp;nbsp; Is this a "trick" used to make the example work with the alpha version of Activiti?&amp;nbsp; Can we build processes with Activiti that are n</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:14:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/is-the-vacation-request-diagram-a-valid-bpmn-diagram/m-p/31689#M16381</guid>
      <dc:creator>netname</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-15T14:14:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is the Vacation Request diagram a valid BPMN diagram?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/is-the-vacation-request-diagram-a-valid-bpmn-diagram/m-p/31690#M16382</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Indeed, the outgoing sequence flow should have a diamond in this case.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The XML does have the expressions on the sequence flow defined.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So you are correct, the process diagram is not 100% valid, I'll update the picture accordingly in the userguide.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;As a sidenote: multiple outgoing sequence flow without sequence flow out of an activity are legal in BPMN 2.0. The semantics are then that all the outgoing sequence flow become parallel executions.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 14:55:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/is-the-vacation-request-diagram-a-valid-bpmn-diagram/m-p/31690#M16382</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-15T14:55:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

