topic Re: Do we need to deploy processes per tenant for multi-tenancy to work? in Alfresco Archive https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210024#M163154 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>It does makes sense to me. It would be a nice addition. Please file a jira issue. </SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:19:45 GMT jbarrez 2015-03-02T10:19:45Z Do we need to deploy processes per tenant for multi-tenancy to work? https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210021#M163151 I have starting looking into Activiti's (version 5.17) multi-tenancy support and have some rookie questions. [disclaimer: I did searched the forums before posting but apologize if this is a repeat topic!]Requirements:&nbsp; a. We will use Activiti's built-in multi-tenancy support using tenant_id fieldb. Sat, 28 Feb 2015 08:54:59 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210021#M163151 asanjum 2015-02-28T08:54:59Z Re: Do we need to deploy processes per tenant for multi-tenancy to work? https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210022#M163152 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>1) Correct. Process definitions are unique per tenant.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>2) Sorry, not possible. Process definitions are tenant-specific. </SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>3) No, the engine doesn't really care. It's just data in the database. The only thing that might need tweaking is the Process definition cache size.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>4) No, that's custom code. Typically, tenants do not share process definitions .. or at least that's not how it is implemented currently.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>5) That would need a serious amount of new code, cause once you start with tenancy, it is applied everywhere. Im thinking there might be workarounds with a custom Process Definition Cache … but I'm not sure of the implications that would have.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:18:51 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210022#M163152 jbarrez 2015-02-28T10:18:51Z Re: Do we need to deploy processes per tenant for multi-tenancy to work? https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210023#M163153 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>Hi Joram,</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>A big thank you for the super fast reply.&nbsp; This is what make the core Activiti team and the product winners.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>This really gives us a lot of clarity and we can move ahead faster with a lot more conviction.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>We have attempted to subclass the DeploymentCache, etc. but there are a lot of calls that are directly done via the CommandExecutor.&nbsp; Not worth the risk for a multi-tenant app. You are the best guys to ponder over how to address this in a clean way.&nbsp; </SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>If you think this kind of requirement (shared process definitions) makes sense, I can post a Jira bug request for future development.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>Once again, thanks a ton.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>Regards,</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>sayeed</SPAN><BR /></BODY></HTML> Sat, 28 Feb 2015 11:21:02 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210023#M163153 asanjum 2015-02-28T11:21:02Z Re: Do we need to deploy processes per tenant for multi-tenancy to work? https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210024#M163154 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>It does makes sense to me. It would be a nice addition. Please file a jira issue. </SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:19:45 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/do-we-need-to-deploy-processes-per-tenant-for-multi-tenancy-to/m-p/210024#M163154 jbarrez 2015-03-02T10:19:45Z