<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Thread safety of signalEventReceived vs signalEventReceivedAsync in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/thread-safety-of-signaleventreceived-vs-signaleventreceivedasync/m-p/204973#M158103</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I think you are referring to a single queue solution, so the order of processing is guaranteed. This is something that's not part of the Activiti core but could be added on top of Activiti. Handling the signals synchronously or asynchronously doesn't really make a difference I think, because multiple threads can invoke the logic at the same time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>trademak</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-08T19:16:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Thread safety of signalEventReceived vs signalEventReceivedAsync</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/thread-safety-of-signaleventreceived-vs-signaleventreceivedasync/m-p/204972#M158102</link>
      <description>Shortly speaking : I need functionality of RuntimeService signalEventReceived(String executionId, Map&amp;lt;String,Object&amp;gt; processVariables) in the asynchronous manner. I wanted to go towards signalEventReceivedAsync, but they don't have a form with setting process variables.For the sake of experime</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2014 14:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/thread-safety-of-signaleventreceived-vs-signaleventreceivedasync/m-p/204972#M158102</guid>
      <dc:creator>michalwrobel</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-01T14:31:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Thread safety of signalEventReceived vs signalEventReceivedAsync</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/thread-safety-of-signaleventreceived-vs-signaleventreceivedasync/m-p/204973#M158103</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I think you are referring to a single queue solution, so the order of processing is guaranteed. This is something that's not part of the Activiti core but could be added on top of Activiti. Handling the signals synchronously or asynchronously doesn't really make a difference I think, because multiple threads can invoke the logic at the same time.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 19:16:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/thread-safety-of-signaleventreceived-vs-signaleventreceivedasync/m-p/204973#M158103</guid>
      <dc:creator>trademak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-08T19:16:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

