<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Updating Activiti in clustered environment in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/updating-activiti-in-clustered-environment/m-p/201695#M154825</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I assume those Activiti servers will go to the same database? If so, the new one will execute upgrades to the schema. That doesn't sound safe to me to do that against a live system. I'd take the 'safe' route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:18:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-28T19:18:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Updating Activiti in clustered environment</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/updating-activiti-in-clustered-environment/m-p/201694#M154824</link>
      <description>Hi,We have a cluster of two servers, both running Servimix with Activiti and using the same database. Both Activitis are running job executors and everything works nicely.We also have another app that interacts with the Servicemix, also one on both servers (users use it with a browser). Then there i</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:58:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/updating-activiti-in-clustered-environment/m-p/201694#M154824</guid>
      <dc:creator>tygerc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-27T14:58:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Updating Activiti in clustered environment</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/updating-activiti-in-clustered-environment/m-p/201695#M154825</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I assume those Activiti servers will go to the same database? If so, the new one will execute upgrades to the schema. That doesn't sound safe to me to do that against a live system. I'd take the 'safe' route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2015 19:18:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/updating-activiti-in-clustered-environment/m-p/201695#M154825</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-28T19:18:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

