<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multi Process Engine Configuration in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multi-process-engine-configuration/m-p/199142#M152272</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; would Tasks that have the same execution_ID be filtered out as duplicates or would they survive the UNION&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I believe (however, not having used union for a long time) they would survive. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; Also is there a way to use a DB sequence that all of the the schemas would use to generate execution ID's that would guarantee uniqueness across all of the schemas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes, see &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://activiti.org/userguide/index.html#advanced.uuid.generator" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://activiti.org/userguide/index.html#advanced.uuid.generator&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 10:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-07-04T10:07:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multi Process Engine Configuration</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multi-process-engine-configuration/m-p/199141#M152271</link>
      <description>Due to our business requirements we are implementing a multiple process engine configuration (as opposed to multi-tenancy) for the build out of our current application suite. Our application will support 8+ applications that will start process instances, but one application that will query for user</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:23:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multi-process-engine-configuration/m-p/199141#M152271</guid>
      <dc:creator>arturo_rosario</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-24T17:23:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi Process Engine Configuration</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multi-process-engine-configuration/m-p/199142#M152272</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; would Tasks that have the same execution_ID be filtered out as duplicates or would they survive the UNION&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I believe (however, not having used union for a long time) they would survive. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;gt; Also is there a way to use a DB sequence that all of the the schemas would use to generate execution ID's that would guarantee uniqueness across all of the schemas&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes, see &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://activiti.org/userguide/index.html#advanced.uuid.generator" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://activiti.org/userguide/index.html#advanced.uuid.generator&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 10:07:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/multi-process-engine-configuration/m-p/199142#M152272</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-07-04T10:07:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

