<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Access control on properties in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/access-control-on-properties/m-p/195666#M148796</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;Permissions and roles are enforced at the node level. This is best explained by considering "Read" permission. Due to interactions with search (which indexes information at the node level) it makes sense that all properties have the same read access as the node. (If not, the values of properties could be deduced by how a readable node was found from a search on restricted properties). If you require finer grained permission for properties this can be achieved by using sub-nodes to partition those properties. Permissions that affect mutability could be enforced at the attribute level but they are not.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This quote is from wiki. Now imagine I have a document and need to add some properties with special ACL. Is it possible to create them as a sub-node as the wii suggests? and if yes how can I achieve this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;thanks very much&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;-arash&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>arashbi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-11-26T16:01:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Access control on properties</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/access-control-on-properties/m-p/195666#M148796</link>
      <description>Permissions and roles are enforced at the node level. This is best explained by considering "Read" permission. Due to interactions with search (which indexes information at the node level) it makes sense that all properties have the same read access as the node. (If not, the values of properties cou</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 16:01:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/access-control-on-properties/m-p/195666#M148796</guid>
      <dc:creator>arashbi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-26T16:01:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access control on properties</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/access-control-on-properties/m-p/195667#M148797</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can you provide more details of what you are trying to achieve? Are these properties you don't want to be searched and displayed?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/access-control-on-properties/m-p/195667#M148797</guid>
      <dc:creator>zaizi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-28T19:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Access control on properties</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/access-control-on-properties/m-p/195668#M148798</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Basically different group of people needs to edit&amp;nbsp; different group of properties on a document. And they should not have access to each others data. It should not be searched and showed in the search result either.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 20:21:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/access-control-on-properties/m-p/195668#M148798</guid>
      <dc:creator>arashbi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-11-28T20:21:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

