<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Current state of the POJO API? in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29008#M14767</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;don't expect the pojo api to be stable in the next year.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=4&amp;amp;t=382" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=4&amp;amp;t=382&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>tombaeyens</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-17T14:27:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Current state of the POJO API?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29005#M14764</link>
      <description>Hi,what is the current state of the POJO API?In 5.0 RC 1 the user guide still talks about POJO API (chapter "Process Virtual Machine API"), but the example does not work anymore. The ProcessDefinitionBuilder is gone.I've read about the project/module restructuring (PVM out/in) but I'm not quite sure</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:27:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29005#M14764</guid>
      <dc:creator>ogeisser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-12T16:27:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Current state of the POJO API?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29006#M14765</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;to follow up my own question.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When I say "ProcessDefinitionBuilder is gone" I mean the Javadocs.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It's still there in the org.activiti.engine.impl.pvm package.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;What I want to know is:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If we have a need for the POJO API use case shall we use this package?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Because from the name of the package (and the absence from the javadocs) I assume it's only internal and we should not rely on this API.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any alternatives now or in the future?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Could someone from the core developers clarify the situation, please?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Olli&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 10:54:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29006#M14765</guid>
      <dc:creator>ogeisser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-13T10:54:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Current state of the POJO API?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29007#M14766</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The reason why it is moved to the internal package, is because we don't want to give the POJO API the same stability guarantees as the service API.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;That's also the reason why it is gone from the javadocs.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Don't get me wrong, the POJO is API is something we definitely like and want to keep in Activiti! &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It's just that at this point in time, we want to expose the BPMN 2.0/service API as our primary API.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 19:44:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29007#M14766</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-15T19:44:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Current state of the POJO API?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29008#M14767</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;don't expect the pojo api to be stable in the next year.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=4&amp;amp;t=382" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://forums.activiti.org/en/viewtopic.php?f=4&amp;amp;t=382&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 14:27:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/current-state-of-the-pojo-api/m-p/29008#M14767</guid>
      <dc:creator>tombaeyens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-17T14:27:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

