topic Mule Task calling a external Mule Standalone Server in Alfresco Archive

Mule Task calling a external Mule Standalone Server

leohackin — Thu, 15 Jan 2015 19:57:56 GMT

Hi folks,I'm working in a Activiti + Mule integration using the Mule Task to call the Mule and get back a response.Today, my architecture is a Tomcat with the Activiti + Mule as a Service and the Mule Standalone running on other server.After configure the Activiti to work correctly and make the Mule

Re: Mule Task calling a external Mule Standalone Server

trademak — Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:31:00 GMT

What is the payload you are sending to Mule exactly? Is it a Java object? You would need to make sure that the payload is a String to have it sent correctly to Mule and vice versa. We have a couple of simple unit tests available that do exactly this in the activiti-mule module.

Best regards,

Re: Mule Task calling a external Mule Standalone Server

leohackin — Fri, 16 Jan 2015 16:02:28 GMT

Hi Tijs,

Glad to hear you.

Thanks to the unit tests it's works now.

Thank you for the great help.

Regards.

Re: Mule Task calling a external Mule Standalone Server

leohackin — Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:25:39 GMT

Hi again Tijs,

One more help: when I send "yes" on payload expression, no matter what I do in Mule, the results is ??t"yes".
I tried convert using Object-to-String trasformer only, Object-to-Byte-Array transformer followed by Byte-Array-to-String transformer.

The result is always this <code>??t[payload-expression]</code>.

I've tested sending a similar request from other ways and worked.

ON the unit tests, don't have any example of Mule's transformation with the received Activiti data.

Could you help me?

Re: Mule Task calling a external Mule Standalone Server

leohackin — Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:02:14 GMT

Hi Tijs,

I've managed to get the right value from Activiti.
To achieve this, I've used this sequence of transformers inside Mule:

<code>Object To Byte Array –> Byte Array to Object –> Object to String</code>

I think that it is needed because the Activiti sends a Object instead of a pure String, right?

Anyway, thanks again.