topic Re: Upgrading from 2.9C to 3.00Dev in Alfresco Archive

Upgrading from 2.9C to 3.00Dev

jlabuelo — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 07:32:28 GMT

Good morning guysThis morning I connected to the Wiki Alfresco Site, to the Nigthly Builds section looking for the last nightly build for 2.9C and I am not able to find it.We are using the multi-tenant configuration in our work group (2.9C) over MySQL5 for Windows 2003 Server. The problem we have no

Re: Upgrading from 2.9C to 3.00Dev

mabayona — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:06:07 GMT

Right, the 2.9C_dev series are not there anymore. It could it mean that Alfresco does not want to upgrade it. (alfresco anyone?). I hope that if this is the case, then the 3.0 is upward compatible and includes all the 2.9 goodies: multitenant, quota, <runas>, …

Anyway, the last one published is from 23-april-2008. If you need it, I can give you acces to my copy.

Re: Upgrading from 2.9C to 3.00Dev

jlabuelo — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:11:16 GMT

Thanks a lot for the offer… I think my copy is also from that date. Did you already try the 3.0Dev version?

Cheers

Re: Upgrading from 2.9C to 3.00Dev

mabayona — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 10:28:27 GMT

No, I did not. I´m following the SVN updates and it sounds as they are still working out very basic details. Although it sounds very promising and Alfresco engineers are very talented, it seems to me we are still some months away to be able to use 3.0 in a beta state.

That´s why it would be very important to get Alfresco to deliver a stable 2.9C since it seems that we are months away to be able to use 3.0.

Re: Upgrading from 2.9C to 3.00Dev

jlabuelo — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:57:03 GMT

Hi again

Did you get any new about a possible stable version for 2.9C?

Cheers

Re: Upgrading from 2.9C to 3.00Dev

mabayona — Mon, 04 Aug 2008 08:20:46 GMT

It seems that Alfresco released 3.0Beta and this is also 2.9C (i read it in the forums). However, I id no have the time to verify it AND to test that:

a) all new functionality in 2.9c_dev (multitenant, Quota, <runas>, …) is in 3.0Beta Labs

b) the release is stable enough to replace a "operational" 2.9B

My impression is that, if you want to replace a 2.9B or 2.9C_dev in "operation", it is better to verify a) and to wait for the second beta expected to be released in September.