topic No end time for Inclusive Gateway in Alfresco Archive https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/no-end-time-for-inclusive-gateway/m-p/173627#M126763 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>Hi,</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>Refer to attached bpmn diagram, both of the condition from the inclusivegateway evaluate true, the summary of the flow is:</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>usertask1 </SPAN><BR /><SPAN>&nbsp; &gt; inclusivegateway1 </SPAN><BR /><SPAN>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; usertask2</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; usertask3</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>&nbsp; &gt; inclusivegateway2</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; usertask4</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>Inclusivegateway1 having a split process, once usertask2 and usertask3 is completed, both join back at inclusivegateway2 and proceed to usertask4.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>However, when I look into table act_hi_actinst, it created the following records, sorted by start_time_:</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>startevent1</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>usertask1</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>inclusivegateway1</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>usertask2</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>inclusivegateway2</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>usertask3</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>inclusivegateway2</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>usertask4</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>Questions:</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>1. Why it created 2 records for inclusivegateway2 but in our diagram we only draw one gateway and it is to join back the split user task?</SPAN><BR /><SPAN>2. End_time_ was blank for both of the inclusivegateway2 records. After debugging, found that in the HistoryManager.class, method findActivityInstance, the executionId was the execution id of usertask4 but inclusivegateway2 is holding a different executionId in the db. Therefore, it was unable to return the correct activity instance to record the end time. Is this consider as a bug?</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>Please advise.</SPAN><BR /><BR /><SPAN>Thanks a lot.</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Tue, 04 Mar 2014 07:10:49 GMT shanegirl 2014-03-04T07:10:49Z No end time for Inclusive Gateway https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/no-end-time-for-inclusive-gateway/m-p/173627#M126763 Hi,Refer to attached bpmn diagram, both of the condition from the inclusivegateway evaluate true, the summary of the flow is:usertask1 &nbsp; &gt; inclusivegateway1 &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; usertask2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; usertask3&nbsp; &gt; inclusivegateway2&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &gt; usertask4Inclusivegateway1 having a split process, once usertask2 and u Tue, 04 Mar 2014 07:10:49 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/no-end-time-for-inclusive-gateway/m-p/173627#M126763 shanegirl 2014-03-04T07:10:49Z Re: No end time for Inclusive Gateway https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/no-end-time-for-inclusive-gateway/m-p/173628#M126764 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>Any update? Your advise is appreciated..</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Thu, 06 Mar 2014 01:34:02 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/no-end-time-for-inclusive-gateway/m-p/173628#M126764 shanegirl 2014-03-06T01:34:02Z Re: No end time for Inclusive Gateway https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/no-end-time-for-inclusive-gateway/m-p/173629#M126765 <HTML><HEAD></HEAD><BODY><SPAN>That does indeed smell like an issue with the activityId and inclusive gateways. Can you create a JIRA-issues for this, maybe with a unit-test attached? That will be really helpful…</SPAN></BODY></HTML> Mon, 10 Mar 2014 10:21:05 GMT https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/no-end-time-for-inclusive-gateway/m-p/173629#M126765 frederikherema1 2014-03-10T10:21:05Z