<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Issue when what BPM controls is different from user's view in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-when-what-bpm-controls-is-different-from-user-s-view/m-p/25184#M12423</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In case the activities that BPM is controlling are different from what users would like&amp;nbsp; to monitor, such as when the activities that BPM is controlling is too low level and users would like to see a higher level of activity monitoring,&amp;nbsp; what should BPM do?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For example, a department is working on task A, department consists of employees. So each employee is working on task A. BPM can only control each employee’s task activity – assignment, accomplishment etc. But users would like to see the department’s accomplishment rather than individual employee’s.&amp;nbsp; When such requirement happens, is it BPM’s responsibility to provide monitoring capability or is it BPM application's ? &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is BPM’s responsibility mainly controlling activities ? Or monitoring activities? It is nice when the two are consistent. But what if when they are not.&amp;nbsp; Can you please share your thoughts?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bill1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-06-01T18:21:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issue when what BPM controls is different from user's view</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-when-what-bpm-controls-is-different-from-user-s-view/m-p/25184#M12423</link>
      <description>In case the activities that BPM is controlling are different from what users would like&amp;nbsp; to monitor, such as when the activities that BPM is controlling is too low level and users would like to see a higher level of activity monitoring,&amp;nbsp; what should BPM do?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For example, a department is working on</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:21:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-when-what-bpm-controls-is-different-from-user-s-view/m-p/25184#M12423</guid>
      <dc:creator>bill1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-01T18:21:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issue when what BPM controls is different from user's view</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-when-what-bpm-controls-is-different-from-user-s-view/m-p/25185#M12424</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;In my experience, the solution there is to make abstractions in the process. Using subprocesses, you can model high-level, business activities, which boil down to low-level activities. BPMN 2.0 has the notion of 'expandable' subprocesses, meaning that by default only the high-level view is shown (not showing the low level ones). You can then 'drill down' those subprocesses. Bruce Silver is a devoted advocate of this approach (which he call 'hierarchical modeling'). His book is certainly worth the money!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:16:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/issue-when-what-bpm-controls-is-different-from-user-s-view/m-p/25185#M12424</guid>
      <dc:creator>jbarrez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-04T12:16:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

