topic Re: lucene problem using webscript in Alfresco Archive

lucene problem using webscript

kayan — Mon, 19 May 2008 21:10:04 GMT

Hi,Here is my sample javascript:var fileName="data";var folderName="789"; var queryString = "@\\{http\\://www.alfresco.org/model/content/1.0\\}name:*'+fileName+'*" ; var srchQuery="PATH:\"/app:company_home/cm:TestData/cm:"+folderName+"}//*\" AND "+queryString+"\"";logger.log(">>> Lucene

Re: lucene problem using webscript

pmonks — Mon, 19 May 2008 21:32:04 GMT

Paths are stored in ISO9075 format, so you need to ISO9075 encode them before searching. For most alphanumeric strings, this won't change the value at all, but there are corner cases (including strings that start with numeric characters) that will be modified by ISO9075 encoding.

There's a utility class (http://dev.alfresco.com/resource/docs/java/repository/org/alfresco/util/ISO9075.html) that provides utility functions for encoding/decoding to/from ISO9075.

Cheers,
Peter

Re: lucene problem using webscript

kayan — Thu, 22 May 2008 10:52:49 GMT

Hi Peter,

Thanks a lot for your quick solution. It worked on my end.

Thanks
Kayan

Re: lucene problem using webscript

_sax — Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:29:35 GMT

I found the same discussion at https://issues.alfresco.com/jira/browse/AWC-1862 but I'm uncertain how I could use the encoding function. Is it usable in a Freemarker template or a javascript inside a Freemarker template?
I tried <#assign Folder=ISO9075.encode(space.properties.name)> or is it
<#assign Folder=${space.properties.name}.encode?ISO9075> ? Thank you!

Re: lucene problem using webscript

_sax — Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:34:12 GMT

Result = ISO9075Encode(MyPath);
in a javascript would do it.

Re: lucene problem using webscript

johanpi — Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:17:40 GMT

Should it not be
var Result = search.ISO9075Encode(mypath);

I get an error without the search part

Re: lucene problem using webscript

_sax — Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:52:08 GMT

You're perfectly right.
One note: Alfresco 3 is needed for this encoding conversion, 2.x throws an error due to the lack of the corresponding function.