<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Memory settings for default Alfresco+TomCat installations in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24098#M11730</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I can confirm that not only does this improve performance, it also makes Alfresco stable (again): no more "out-of-heap" space errors any longer.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Having said that, I must still report that access to the CIFS interface of Alfresco is slower than access to standard network drives.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Would it help to increase the memory size to 1gb?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Or can I expect better performance on a server with more CPU power?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>omegerard</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-01-09T08:28:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Memory settings for default Alfresco+TomCat installations</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24097#M11729</link>
      <description>FYI… The default memory settings for the Alfresco+Tomcat bundles are very low - they are using the JVM default of 64MB unless you explicity set it to another value.We suggest that you change the JAVA_OPTS variable to increase the memory to 512mb or greater depending on your machine specifications. W</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2006 11:31:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24097#M11729</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevinr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-04T11:31:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory settings for default Alfresco+TomCat installations</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24098#M11730</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I can confirm that not only does this improve performance, it also makes Alfresco stable (again): no more "out-of-heap" space errors any longer.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Having said that, I must still report that access to the CIFS interface of Alfresco is slower than access to standard network drives.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Would it help to increase the memory size to 1gb?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Or can I expect better performance on a server with more CPU power?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:28:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24098#M11730</guid>
      <dc:creator>omegerard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-09T08:28:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory settings for default Alfresco+TomCat installations</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24099#M11731</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Glad to hear it's improved the performance (and stability!) We should never have shipped the bundles without a setting of at least 256MB, with 512MB being recommended. Appologies for that mistake.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The CIFS protocol is quite CPU intensive at the moment, so yes a server with more powerful CPU will probably help more than more memory, but if you have a 1GB to spare then it will help some. We will be working on a round of performance improvements for CIFS in a later release.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kevin&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:11:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24099#M11731</guid>
      <dc:creator>kevinr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-09T10:11:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Memory settings for default Alfresco+TomCat installations</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24100#M11732</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the response.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This issue has lost some of its urgency since I noticed that the webdav interface allows drag&amp;amp;drop operations. On the laptop I'm using, I work on W2K and, incidentally, in the webdav interface I cannot drag and drop files. Is that the normal behaviour of webdav on W2K? Or do I have to switch on an (obscure) property/feature?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:11:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/memory-settings-for-default-alfresco-tomcat-installations/m-p/24100#M11732</guid>
      <dc:creator>omegerard</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-01-10T15:11:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

