<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why IdentitySession operated with EntityObjects? in Alfresco Archive</title>
    <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-identitysession-operated-with-entityobjects/m-p/22524#M10820</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm trying to implement own IdentitySession - I need to get information about User &amp;amp; Groups from another system (Liferay in my case).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It is not a big problem - since I've already did same thing for jBPM4 - and Activiti and jBPM4 are quite close in this par tof API.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But - I was surprised, why Interface IdentitySession operated not only by interfaces (Group, User), but with implementation classes as well (GroupEntity, UserEntity).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Since both classes are almost POJO - it is not a big issue to implement their initialization, just question from architecture perspective - for me it looks much better if top-level interfaces operated by interfaces (like it was in IdentitySession in jBPM4) - not by concrete implementations&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:54:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>akakunin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-05T22:54:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why IdentitySession operated with EntityObjects?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-identitysession-operated-with-entityobjects/m-p/22524#M10820</link>
      <description>Hi!I'm trying to implement own IdentitySession - I need to get information about User &amp;amp; Groups from another system (Liferay in my case).It is not a big problem - since I've already did same thing for jBPM4 - and Activiti and jBPM4 are quite close in this par tof API.But - I was surprised, why In</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 22:54:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-identitysession-operated-with-entityobjects/m-p/22524#M10820</guid>
      <dc:creator>akakunin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-05T22:54:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why IdentitySession operated with EntityObjects?</title>
      <link>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-identitysession-operated-with-entityobjects/m-p/22525#M10821</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;i can't recall if there was a specific reason for it.&amp;nbsp; your request seems valid.&amp;nbsp; we should try to switch to interfaces.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;created &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ACT-319" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/ACT-319&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:02:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://connect.hyland.com/t5/alfresco-archive/why-identitysession-operated-with-entityobjects/m-p/22525#M10821</guid>
      <dc:creator>tombaeyens</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-08T15:02:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

